Linux Mint vs Ubuntu : Whose Experience is Good

Linux Mint vs Ubuntu This is very easy to know, Linux Mint is around the most accessible simple Linux. And to let you know that it originated from Ubuntu which remains the most popular Linux distro. Linux Mint vs Ubuntu There is a big difference between these two Linux Leviathanes and we are going to compare which you have to decide

Linux Mint vs Ubuntu: Which is better

Linux Mint has a different approach than Ubuntu for creating Linux distributions when based on Ubuntu. When Linux mint is mentioned in this article it refers to the cinnamon version and for Ubuntu, it is a plain reference vanilla 2004 version.

System requirements

One notable difference between the latest Ubuntu and Mint versions is that their system requirements are accustomed to adding new and more features to Ubuntu and over the years it has become heavier and more demanding than Mint.

You probably can’t tell the difference between older PC owners and older PCs. Maybe better.

Installation

Both Ubuntu and Mint use the Ubuntu installer to make their installations almost identical. To install Ubuntu you can use the zfs file system which is unsupported by Mint,

Mint looks more open-source friendly in which you choose to install additional codecs for your media Can. Basically installed with Ubuntu as far as we know.

Software

The Linux Mint comes with a somewhat larger application selection in which you can find Warpinator and you use an older tool called GiverWinRupinator, enabling M’s more popular. AirDrop devises to quickly exchange files on the local network and simply. The distributions come with the expected Firefox library office fees and multimedia file manager email, etc.

Lint’s software manager has the upper hand in various utilities as it is faster than Ubuntu’s software center, where you can also decide between two distribution mints. Defaults do not support snaps by default.

Many other open-source advocates don’t like mint developers how to practically handle it. In the Snaps format, I take no side in this issue. But I can say that they present valid points for their point of view.

Kernel

While Ubuntu 2004 and Linux Mint 20 share the same 5.4 kernel support, both features are not the same for both distros.

For example, The Canonical 5.4 kernel has a backported wire guard that is lacking in the latest version of Mint. Although the Mint kernel theoretically supports zfs. That the functionality is not exposed to the end-user

zfs

The Canonical Z system allows everyone to use one of the best features of ZFS automatically via a file system snapshot.

Support ZFS so there are no automatic snapshots here. Mint comes with its own backup tool and it works great but not the same for backup file system level snapshots

Wireguard

Wire guard to VPN today. Considered to be the best option and has also been praised by Linus for Torvald.

It added support for the wire guard in Ubuntu’s 2004 kernel but the mint kernel seems to have ignored it doesn’t mean you can’t use it. The wire guard on the mint is just that it is not included in its version of the 5.4 kernel.

Desktop

Ubuntu uses the latest version of GNOME while Linux uses mint, Cinnamon. Both GNOME and Cinnamon are customizable but for GNOME you need to install additional extensions. When the cinnamon customization options come right after installing Mint with Cinnamon.

The first window allows you to tweak the main bar setup between modern and classic configurations. You can change color accents Install new themes and change your wallpapers automatically or with just a few clicks. Mint’s approaches look more user-friendly around.

But its collection of customization options is less than Ubuntu.

Live patch

Live Patch is one of the latest features of Ubuntu, although it is not brand new, it is a new updating mechanism that promises to restart after every single system update unless you have a PC like running a Linux server 24 hours a day.

The live patch is useful, unlike Windows. Linux updates You do not need to restart your computer immediately and it does not restart on its own.

Real-world performance

On relatively new PCs, both Ubuntu and Mint work the same way as the specs go down. It seems a little snapper to test the appetite for mint desktop resources. I have set up two identical virtual machines.

I have hardware with only two gigabytes of RAM and two Limited to CPU. It is also worth noting that Ubuntu was using 1.4 gigabytes of RAM and 618 megabytes of swap mint after a clean boot. Then it was using core megabytes of RAM and 307 megabytes of swap. Ubuntu will take considerable time to get started.

Which is the best?

Older PCs are more clear winners on mint than modern PCs, the choice is not clear as both offer different experiences and if you prefer the desktop page simplicity and quick easy customization, the part on desktop preferences depends on you.

Ubuntu is a better choice for you if you choose a simple desktop of the GNOME 3 approach that is not so easy to customize or if you need zfs.